Alex Miller's Black Hole Astrology

Walker Recall Vote Post Mortem

by Alex Miller on June 8, 2012

Walker Recall Prediction Post Mortem

[Editor’s note: Alex’s original article predicting Walker’s likely defeat is available here.]

Omelettes all around! There’s enough cosmic egg on my face to accommodate everyone!

Frequent readers of my work will attest that I rarely predict; most of my articles chronicle events after the fact, explaining these in terms of celestial patterns involving deep space points and asteroids. Part of the reason for this is Black Holes themselves, which defy prediction, and, as noted in the preceding article, can be “hazardous” to anticipate.

Black Holes have two major thrusts—one is instability and dramatic changes in the status quo reality; the other regards their function as points of energy attraction and energy drain. In the case of the Wisconsin recall, I mistakenly assumed the result of their effects would be change, which is a more common manifestation of their energies, when in reality, they were operating in this instance more in the mode of energy drain, given the vast amount of resources of money, time and energy which were expended to no purpose in the recall, leaving matters just as they were before. (Well, perhaps not quite—in addition to the Walker recall attempt, four newly elected Republican state senators were up for recall, and one of these, Van Wanggaard, appears as of this writing to have been ousted by challenger John Lehman; if this is so, then Democrats regain control of the Wisconsin upper house, making passage of Walker’s future agenda very difficult, and perhaps effectively neutering him politically.)

The only other anomaly which I cited in the article is one with a performance much easier to predict, when I anticipated high voter turnout from Mercury on a Quasar. That prediction was accurate—with 2.5 million votes cast, the recall brought out more voters than the 2010 election which first installed Walker, with 2.1 million votes. Several polling places ran out of ballots, and in many precincts long lines of voters remained when polls officially closed.

The other reason I don’t generally predict is that, in recent years, my work has become increasingly focused on the use of personal named asteroids, and I have serious misgivings about the level of causation they embody. That is, are they co-creative energies, or merely descriptive?

If the Wisconsin recall is any indication, then they seem to be descriptors, not determiners, and their use as predictive tools is likely ineffective. In hindsight, seen as descriptors only, without any weight given to any causative effect, most of what I wrote does apply as a description of the day’s events:

  • asteroid Barrett with Sun/Venus as an indicator of Tom Barrett’s prominence for the day,
  • its square to Mars signaling his challenge to Walker,
  • its opposition to Nemesis/Hidalgo defining his role as avenger of the people and champion of the oppressed;
  • asteroid Walker with Sisyphus depicting a replay of the 2012 match-up, and with
  • Varuna as a determiner of his legacy,
  • its square to Eris marking the atmosphere of discord he had engendered in the state;
  • asteroid Scott with Uranus as a sign of the rebellion Walker faced.

If this article had been written as a post mortem, as most of my pieces are, then the error of anticipating an outcome from these asteroid placements would have obviously been avoided, but much of what was said would still have applied.

In general, this was an analysis of the day itself, an attempt to determine an outcome based solely in the isolation of the moment, with little reference to the candidate’s natal charts, which I do not have in full. Obviously, astrology is more complex than that, but my experience of analysis of events in hindsight led me to anticipate a probable outcome, which was in error. Given that asteroid placements here do not appear to have been determinative, then the answer to what occurred in Wisconsin on Tuesday would lie in the transits and progressions active in the charts of the two competitors, which is information I do not possess.

I want to add a final word about vote fraud. The specter of this was alluded to in the article, and was raised by Republicans in advance of the recall vote. I want to make it very clear that I am not alleging fraud in this case, but I do want to stress that given the state of election technology in America today, there really is no way to know with any degree of certainty that any official outcome accurately reflects the votes actually cast.

It has been repeatedly demonstrated how pathetically simple it is to alter vote totals in e-vote systems. The capacity to do so exists, and certainly the will to do so is not lacking, and currently there is no adequate system of verification to ensure that vote tampering is not occurring, in any race from county comptroller to US president.

This represents one serious threat to our democracy currently; another has been on display in the recall campaign, which is the unlimited amounts of money from undisclosed donors made possible by the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision. Walker raised a total of nearly $31 million for this recall, almost two-thirds of it from undisclosed out-of-state contributors, to Barrett’s $4.5 million, only 25% of which came from beyond Wisconsin’s borders.

The ability of powerful interests to buy elections with unlimited contributions, or to steal via vote fraud those elections which they cannot buy, has created a parlous state of elections in the US, one which has serious consequences for the world’s oldest democracy.

Print Friendly
Stephen Robbins June 12, 2012 at 9:20 am

Mr. Miller, let me ignore all your attempts at rationalization. Even a quick search shows at least four astrologers were in your “Scott Walker will lose” camp. It is phenomenon I now like to label the “astrological/spiritual left,” where the standard trend in the political ideology of astrologers makes it clear they are, in general, quite blinded. You obviously have no understanding of what happened here in Wisconsin, or its spiritual significance. Perhaps some day you will learn. And by the way Lehman was elected in the old district as it existed before the districts were redrawn. The vote pattern re the new district shows he never would have been elected. He is effectively a dead issue. Further, the fraud, on side of the left in the Racine district 21 was massive. Lehman was elected by 774 votes – this is far less, given the election observer reports, than the margin of fraud. Finally, the Wisc legislature is out til Jan, there are elections in Nov. and it is clear the Repubs will retake the Senate then. In other words, the Dems effectively retook a puff of air. No, Walker will not be neutered, and no, you have no clue as to the significance of Scott Walker.

Vicki June 12, 2012 at 11:51 am

Alex, thanks for your fine work. I was really hoping your predictions were accurate heralds of the revolution of the goodly grassroots. Alas, my hopes are dashed that democracy is salvageable as we spiral further into plutocracy. How horrible do things have to get before the People wake up? I truly despair.

Margaret Kreyer June 14, 2012 at 6:22 am

Dear Mr. Miller,

I must agree with the above comment by Stephen Robbins re: the astrological/spiritual left.

One thing we may ponder, the fact that astrology does predict trend and possibility but free will has always been an x factor.

I also agree with you re: the named asteroids.

Election fraud is a problem across the board and voter intimidation in the inner city caucuses during the last presidential primaries is surely a matter to be investigated.

Contributions to ALL parties should be scrutinized.

I enjoy your articles and the Daykeeper Journal.

Margaret Kreyer

Pat Flannagan June 14, 2012 at 7:49 am

Thanks Alex for having the true grit to admit and analyze your mistake. I am most interested t00 in the idea of using asteroids as predictors vs descriptors. This setback for you seems to confirm as you say, a descriptive factor for them. It’s a challenge for all astrologers to call an election of any kind. I’ve seen some of the best blow it. One’s own bias is so powerful. My favorite technique for seeking objectivity is to look at how the next lunation AFTER the election falls in the candidates respective charts. Usually its pretty easy to tell who’s partying and who’s packing their bags. Please continue your meticulous work on asteroids and black holes as you are making a unique contribution here. Regards as always.

Mary June 14, 2012 at 3:27 pm

I appreciate you willingness to step back and re-analyze. I also think the change is not yet complete for several reasons: 1) It takes a monumental amount of uphill work to even begin a recall, so the problem was very serious to begin with. 2) How can anything be predicted, when the polls were extremely close, yet the media was calling the election for Walker way before the voters had finished? 3) What really happened with the voting machines? Who owns them, and who calibrates them? 4) How can we predict anything, when mountains of secret cash is flowing in? My last question: why do right extremists have to be snarky, poor sports, when they WIN as well as when they lose? Perhaps the black hole energy is at work on this weird phenomenon.

Nancy June 16, 2012 at 4:17 pm

Maya used to say sometimes we can’t always see things that are manifesting themselves, Alex. Scott Walker may not stay in office.

Investigations by the Milwaukee district attorney’s office and a federal agency into his mishandling of funds and county property when he was the Milwaukee County Administrator is getting closer to him every day. So far, 13 of his employees have testified to keep themselves out of jail and Walker has two high-powered attorneys working for him even though he has not yet been charged.

Al Pfeifer December 21, 2012 at 3:30 pm

Nothing ventured, nothing gained. I accept astrology as an inexact science or perhaps an art-science hybrid. That said, I agree with those who suggest that Walker’s victory may have been pyrrhic. Only time will tell.

I remember back in the early 1990s when Michael Wolfstar predicted that Bush I’s gulf war would end up a quagmire. Some were happy to scream “Wrong!” when US troops were out as fast as they were in. Yet Bush I’s war set up Bush II’s war, which definitely was a quagmire.

And all of this brings to mind what a college history professor taught us in a Modern European History class back in the early ’70s. He said that WWI and WWII were so closely related to each other that essentially they were the same war.

Previous post:

Next post: